This interesting article piece talks about the
history and construction of masculinity throughout different
epochs. It suggests
that what is currently considered masculine is only a fairly recent cultural
construction
and a product of modernity. It looks at different types of
masculinities that can exist simultaneously (for
example, football and competitive
sports, the dominant, physical, and aggressive, alongside intellectual
masculinity which is competitive still but in an academic nature) Further, it
compares social constructions of
masculinity to those in other countries,
especially the third world to examine the differences found there. It
also
speaks about the patriarchal dividend, the benefits and advantages conferred
upon men who conform
to such hegemonic masculinities. It suggests that
masculinity is mostly cultural, fluid, and open to change over
time or through
differing social forces and actors. Through this article it is shown that
masculinity is a socially
constructed concept and thus not a static or fixed
idea, and thus open to the possibility of hope for change in
the future.
No comments:
Post a Comment